About your Search

20121202
20121202
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8
to be the highest unemployment in history for two terms it is not careful. he will take us back into recession. if he wants serious negotiations that will sit down and me to some kind of an agreement. we have been down this road before where republicans of given on th taxes. was in the white house with reagan. they promised dollars in cuts. they didn't give us anything. bush went through the same drill when he broke his tax pledge, busch sr. we have had this history before. basically, tell us what you're going to do. there will be a stimulus by fixing he northeast from the storm. add another 50 billion out there on top of the package. and then the audacity of saying, i'm going to raise the debt ceiling whenever i want to. give me permission to do that. it's absolutely absurd. lou: the presidents reached exceing his grasp? >> we will ee. he clearly thinks that he is in a strong osition or you would not be trying this. i think he thinks that the optics work for him. >> but it was ms. mccall's idea in 2011 to give the president the power to raise the debt ceiling by himself. this was not some dmo
mount up from the big guys and little guys like us get routed back from the table do to a smothering bunch of regulations. government interventions come at the result of wind things it out of control. i health care costs to go $150 billion. john: it's his body. he can make his own stupid choices. >> i never believe that i'm hurting anybody's freedom. john: youare banning things. you support the ban on the soft drinks. >> well, the big soft drink is important to realize that we need said -- you have children at the age of nine. they suffer from hypertension as a result of too much soda, too much sugar as a result that people ae not taking their own responsibility. that is when government jump into it. john: how can you say you're leaving them your toys? you're not. >> well, they should be glad. we're trying to do it. john: this is dangerous. too big. >> depending howmany of thoe you have. john: illegal. >> that's the reason i have the surcharge on it, to make sure that people get discouraged from getting this kind of items. john: and you want to -- [talking over each other] john: it b
as totally inept or more inept than it is right now. and businesses free us up and they're afraid of doing anything and the individual freezes up. look, who is going to be out there actively investing and looking for work? you just don't know what's going to happen with all that we need to get something done, as bad as it might be. >> and does a month or two really make a difference? at some point, they're going to come up with something. >> yeah, that's right. i mean, i think a month or two a probably okay. and, but i'mith gary. if they kick this thing back a year, it really confirms the markets worst suspensions, which is thawe've got a congress that has absolutely no functionality whatsoever, they're well and truly broken and i mean, that would be disturbing, kicking back a month or two, i think the market can stomach that. i don't think the market would want to see us kick it back a year or two, no, no, no. >> here is the deal, tobin, what about we kick the can, we kick the can, we kk the can and the road is a what i, essentially, if we never cut spending, what's the issue there? >> we
. the u.s. stocks all the way. >> brenda: jonas, prediction? go for it. >> there's a helium shortage and it's good tore air products and chemicals up 20% for the year, up and up and away. >> brenda: toby? >> and now what? i don't think it's heliu he's ingestingight there. (laughter) >> and happy birthday, toby. >> thank you very mu. >> brenda: take it away, plea please. >> neil: with the fiscal doomsday 30 days away and us 16 trillion bucks in the red. is there any time for shelling out more green. hi, everyone, happy to have you. and so much for the spending cuts to cut our debt and falling for billions in new stimulus spending. get this, it would be part of the dough aimed at avoiding a cliff by creating more spending. are you following this? i'm not. maybe these guys are. ben stein, charles payne, sandra smith and adam and charl charlie. >> you laugh because you want to cry. >> neil: sometimes you laugh simply because you want to laugh. (laughter) >> since november 2011, we're 30 days away from this. are you serious? you want 50 billion in stimulus? it's nuts, crazy and disingen
that republicans have been mandated, he wants more spending and he's not giving us any entitlement savings and on top of that, like you mention, he has no limit on his authority. so he's spending just as he has over the past four years into oblivion. gerri: so there is no debt ceiling. he has a checkbook, he can use it anyway that he wants to. that is shocking and astonishing to many folks. there is also this. the president has talked over and over again about a balanced approach. everybody has to give up something. everybody gets a little something. so he proposes $1.6 in tax hikes. only 400 billion in cuts. in hat way is this balance? >> i think this has been a mistake the republicans have made. i do not believe that we have a revenue problem. in the long run, we have a spending problem and it is mostly an entitlement problem. i think it was a mistake for speaker boehner and others for revenue on the table to begin with. that being said, they all agree in a balanced approach. what the president has put forward, it des not even address the problems. if you don't start negotiations talk ab
the table. >> moment yoize social security or voucherize medicare or block grant medicaid you lose us. >> but the new forbes report showing that more people in the states are taking money from the government than the private sector, can our nation afford deal that doesn't put so-called entitlements on the table. i am dave. we'll go to. mike, to you. we have to put entitlements on the table? >> for the sake of the over all economy we must put enments on the table. over the last four years entitlement spending is growing faster than the over all economy. this is why president obama has this country in record debt. that hurt the economy. take-home pay decreased under president obama. we must get entitlements under control. >> rick at the unemployment and housing vouchers. it is 800 billion extra spending. doesn't that have to be cut. >> there is no chance that there will be a dole without entitlement cuts. what sator durbin is talking about is the importance of focusing. if we want a deal you will not doing by taking a wide sprect rum appoach. president clinton was clear when he spoke to
taxpayers a cent. that's it for us. have a pleasant weekend, good night from new york. neil: good evening. >> it's not house, it's a at the home. and we need help. >> we are the people. we are the middle class. neil: this is getting heated. the fury over fema. welcome, i am neil cavuto. staten island residents erupted ov a fema that this is not helping. they are in a self-congratulatory bubble. >> fema has been fantastic. >> tay you hear nothing about the things about fema. >> everyone has made this a number one priority and this continues to be my number one priority. neil: it remains sticky with this politician parade. thousands of angry vicms simply looking for answers, and they are not getting them. cash-strapped homeowners dealing with mortgage is very much alive and well and thinks the dataset on keeping those mortgages current. this week it is like an awful lot. it's piling up. this next guest knows it firsthand. scott mcgra. he was at that town hall meeting and he joins me now on the phone. or, you made your views very clear. very lovely. very well. did you get any respons
and tracey and john . jill joining us. wayne we'll start with you. is it time for a national lottery to pay down the federal debt same time. >> a question why not. if it works with the state governments. why not the federal government and make it a big and huge one and any lttle niche that you can knock down the deficit is good. >> okay, but john, what happens to the states. we are finding out that california is signing up for powerball because of the revenues that they get. ist bad for states. >> it is really bad for states. wayne has much chae of winning the lottery as geth through a comment without johnathon interrupting. >> zero. >> and the problem you have with this. this could be a billion dollar ck mots and huge and going to kill the state lottos and in the stouthern states. they were sold as a way of funding education . that didn't happen. they are dependent on the general fund. cash strapped states that depend on the lotto, you will cripple the funding for the states is it a bad idea. it robseter to pay paul. >> johnathon, you wouldn't be cutting wayne off. >> i am keeping quiet. w
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8